Trump demands Republicans ‘kill’ bill that would protect journalists from government spying
New York
CNN
—
In between his posts on Truth Social announcing nominees for his incoming administration, President-elect Donald Trump urged Republicans Wednesday to nix a bipartisan bill that would give journalists greater protections under federal law.
Trump wrote on his favorite social network that "REPUBLICANS MUST KILL THIS BILL!"
He linked to a PBS "NewsHour" interview with Jodie Ginsberg, the CEO of the Committee to Protect Journalists, who urged the Senate to pass the legislation.
Known as the PRESS Act, the Protect Reporters From Exploitative State Spying Act would prevent the government from forcing journalists to reveal their sources and limit the seizure of their data without their knowledge.
According to the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, one of the many groups advocating for the bill, "The PRESS Act would bar the federal government from using subpoenas, search warrants, or other compulsory actions against journalists to force the disclosure of information identifying confidential sources as well as other newsgathering records, except in very limited circumstances. It would also broadly limit the government's ability to use the same actions against third parties, including email providers and search engines, to seize journalists' data, with narrow exceptions."
The bill has been passed by the House of Representatives twice with bipartisan support, and it has Republican sponsors in the Senate, but it has been stalled for months in the Senate Judiciary Committee, with Sen. Tom Cotton is said to be holding up the measure.
Cotton's office did not respond to a request for comment about his position on the bill.
Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski attend the Daily Front Row's Fashion Media Awards on September 8, 2017 in New York.
Paul Morigi/Getty Images/File
Related article
‘Morning Joe' meeting with Trump was driven by fears of retribution from incoming administration, sources say
After Trump's reelection earlier this month, press advocacy groups redoubled their efforts to get the legislation signed into law before the end of President Joe Biden's term.
"It's really important that we have that federal shield law to protect journalists at the federal level," Ginsberg said on PBS. "We know that Trump is interested in going after whistleblowers, people who leak. And it's absolutely essential that they are protected… and that journalists are allowed to do their job."
Several media outlets and newspaper editorial boards have urged readers to contact their senators and lobby for the passage of the bill.
"Hostility toward the news media in the polarized politics of the day makes it more urgent than ever to ensure that reporters can continue to pursue their essential role as watchdogs," The New York Times editorial board opined last month.
HBO host John Oliver also promoted the bill on the post-election edition of "Last Week Tonight."
But "Senate Democrats are running out of time" to pass the law, WIRED reporter Dell Cameron wrote last week. Democratic lawmakers have focused on confirming Biden's judicial nominees during the lame-duck session.
Trump's edict on Wednesday may have sealed the bill's fate while also raising public awareness of the issue.
Trevor Timm, executive director of Freedom of the Press Foundation, told CNN that Trump should reconsider his position because "the PRESS Act protects conservative and independent journalists just as much as it does anyone in the mainstream press."
"Democratic administrations abused their powers to spy on journalists many times, too," he said. "The bipartisan PRESS Act will stop government overreach and protect the First Amendment once and for all."
"Much of the reporting Trump likes, from the Twitter files to stories poking holes in the Russiagate conspiracy, came from confidential sources," Timm observed. "Many Trump supporters from Rep. Jim Jordan to Sen. Mike Lee are champions of the PRESS Act because it would protect all journalists, including many who reach primarily conservative audiences. That's good for the public, whether they voted Republican or Democrat."
